Down With... Plot

If you have ever in your life been privy to a conversation about cutting-edge popular entertainment (especially film or television) you will almost certainly have encountered someone issuing dire warnings about spoilers.

People generally define a spoiler as something that gives away an important plot point or narrative twist - thereby "spoiling" the experience of actually watching (or reading) the work in question for themselves.

I urge caution at this point, because I know emotions on the internet can run high when discussing spoilers. (Actually, emotions on the internet run just as high when discussing brussels sprouts. Emotions don't really need an excuse to run high on the internet.)

The question of how much spoilers can actually spoil anything is a very personal one. I know that some people can't stand going into a drama knowing in advance that Hamlet is going to die, or that the Titanic is going to sink. But it sometimes feels that if you really want to live your life without knowing in advance that Darth Vader is Luke's father, or that Soylent Green is people, your best course of action is to switch off the internet, cancel your mobile phone contract and never read a book ever again.

Quite frankly, it can be difficult to have a conversation about any aspect of culture without giving something away, so there will inevitably come a time in everyone's life when they learn that Oedipus is married to his mother. (Freud named a whole complex after that one. The entire field of psycho-analysis is basically one big spoiler.)

There is, however, another school of thought about spoilers. 

Maybe, just maybe, there are situations where spoilers don't matter; where they don't actually spoil anything.

It's reasonably safe to say that the vast majority of theatre-goers attending a new performance of Macbeth already know how it's going to end. But a really good drama isn't merely about "what happens next" or "how does it come out". If that were true then there would never be any point in reading or watching anything more than once. 

You do occasionally encounter popular culture moments which recognise that not every plot twist is a spoiler.

Sometimes, marketing departments are quite happy to reveal fairly significant plot elements because they gamble that knowing such things will make people more interested, not less.

ummm... spoilers?

And then there's Raymond Chandler.

Chandler is (quite rightly) considered the patriarch of 20th Century "hard-boiled" detective fiction. His tough but lyrical prose style forms the archetype for the entire genre of modern crime stories - which makes it all the more interesting when you realise that his stories really don't have plots.



Consider The Big Sleep.


Detective Philip Marlowe has been hired by the elderly General Sternwood. The General is being blackmailed for reasons that are a little vague, and he wants Marlowe to... do something about it, I guess. Marlowe's investigation leads him to a pornographer (who promptly gets murdered) and there's some business about a mutual friend who may or may not be dead. Meanwhile, the General's chauffeur is murdered (we never do find out why) and there's some business about the General's younger daughter, Carmen. And Marlowe gets beaten up a lot. Quite a few people get shot. 

The Big Sleep is completely spoiler-proof, because there is no plot to spoil. Nothing in the story makes any sense at all, but that isn't the point. Like a piece of modern music, it has tension, drama, substance and emotion, but no tune.

What the film version of The Big Sleep does have is Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall practically setting the screen on fire.

It has some of the punchiest dialogue ever written for a noir drama and it has a series of memorable and menacing supporting characters. 

Who cares if the plot makes no sense?

Spoiler alerts work both ways. If revealing the plot in advance can spoil a film, then what happens when there is no plot? The Big Sleep is a complex, juicy, full-course meal of a film. It represents Bogart, Bacall and director Howard Hawks at the very peak of their careers, and it rewards repeated viewing. 

And it cannot be spoiled, because there is nothing that can be summarised in a glib "plot synopsis". The only way to experience The Big Sleep is to actually experience it. You still won't know who killed the chauffeur, or what exactly happened to Sean Regan, or whether Eddie Mars had ever met Carmen before, but who cares? That's not what any of this is about.

You'll be able to judge for yourself when we screen The Big Sleep at (spoiler alert!) 7.30pm on Thursday, the 20th of July at the Victoria Park Baptist Church.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Carry On... #Don't Trust Anyone over 25

Image
Please note that this week's film has been rated  12  in the UK. Last week's film ( Logan's Run ) is a prime example of a science fiction film that was emphatically a product of the era in which it was made. If anything, its very relevance proved to be its vulnerability. By the time it reached the theatres in 1976, many of the social trends it was responding to were already starting to fade. That may also be why attempts to produce a remake have consistently failed to make any headway. Hollywood studios have repeatedly attempted to reboot Logan's Run over the decades, and at least six different directors have embarked on such a project over the last 30 years. Multiple writers have been approached, and in some cases have written complete screenplays - but to no avail. Logan's Run has remained stubbornly and imperviously un-remade. If you think about it (and I have, trust me) remaking Logan's Run is easier said than done. After a decade of hippie culture, you...
Read more

The Best Bond Film of All Time; Thursday the 14th of October

Image
 James Bond has been in the news quite a bit recently, following the much-delayed release of No Time to Die , the most recent offering in this (almost) 60-year-old film franchise. No time to die, indeed. Like all self-respecting zombies, the James Bond character is steadfastly refusing to lie down and stop breathing, despite (or perhaps because of) six decades of sexism, racism, casual violence, jingoism and sexism (sexism is a very big thing in the Bond franchise). It should really have been called  Enough Already. Still, the Bond Movie has become an important cultural icon, and each offering follows an instantly recognisable style and pattern: a suave hero in a tailored suit, a smooth-talking but quietly menacing villain with a dangerous and (devotedly) faithful henchman, a beautiful, sexually available girl, a wide variety of exotic and photogenic locations and an endless parade of increasingly complicated and implausible assassination attempts. What's not to love? With all...
Read more

The Feast of "Stephen"

Image
If you're a Christian, you might know "The Feast of Stephen" as St. Stephen's Day (the 26th of December) when young men dress up in vaguely nightmarish straw costumes and wander around the town playing alarming music while carrying a dead bird. This is not about that. If you're a Doctor Who fan, you might know The Feast of Stephen as the first ever Doctor Who Christmas episode (broadcast on Christmas Day in 1965).  This is not about that either. For our purposes this week, The Feast of Stephen  concerns a small but pivotal character in the beloved Noël Coward/David Lean classic Brief Encounter .  Brief Encounter is remembered today as perhaps the most famous unconsummated love affair in cinema history. Released in 1945 (but without so much as the slightest hint of a war or its effects) it tells the story of two (married) individuals who meet by chance on a train platform and proceed to teeter on the brink of having an affair for a few weeks. They do not, in fac...
Read more

Another Cold War Movie. A very, very Cold War Movie.

Image
 Last week we saw a film about the Cold War as seen by a director who experienced it as a young teenager. The International situation may have been apocalyptic and grim, but none of that mattered as much as the newest monster movie. This week is going to be another film about the Cold War, but viewed through the very different lens of a director in his mid-fifties who had lived through the eras of World War Two and The Holocaust. Billy Wilder may be (quite rightly) remembered for films like Sunset Boulevard, Double Indemnity, The Lost Weekend, Some Like it Hot etc. but One, Two, Three is one of his most cynical, savage and unforgiving comedies. Berlin in 1961 was a divided city. The East and West were controlled by the Russians and Americans respectively, but travel between the two regions was still possible. It was in fact during the making of this film that the infamous wall went up, sealing East Berlin off from the West for almost thirty years. I'm not going to attempt to expl...
Read more

And So, the 70's...

Image
 Raging Riders, and Lots of Bull Depending on who you ask, the ten-year period of 1965-1975 was either one of the best eras in American cinema, or one of the worst. While it was certainly a Golden Age if you were a straight white male who loved extreme violence, casual sexism, xenophobia and homophobia, it was far less enjoyable if such things tended to make you uncomfortable. (Three guesses how I feel about this era.) To some extent, Cinema was merely reflecting the tone of Society itself during that decade. After living through the Cuban Missile Crisis, the assassination of  President Kennedy (and, two years later, Malcolm X; and a few years after that , Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King) there were the almost daily news reports of  violent suppression of  Civil Rights campaigners and (if you wanted some relief from the vicious and bloody domestic news) there was the ongoing horror show of the Vietnam War. Eventually of course the 1960s came to an end, and Ame...
Read more