Romeo & Juliet & Tom & Gwyneth

 Last month we screened Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead; Tom Stoppard's absurdist exploration of the unluckiest characters in Hamlet.

This Thursday, Tom Stoppard sets his sights on Romeo and Juliet in a very mainstream and high profile film.


Last week's West Side Story (which is of course a modern re-telling of Romeo and Juliet) has been criticised by some because Maria was not played by a Puerto Rican. 


As Shakespeare in Love reminds us, the original Juliet was not played by a woman.


Tom Stoppard's very sharp screenplay celebrates Shakespeare and his writing without concerning itself with anything as trivial as "historical accuracy" (Shakespeare himself would have been so proud).


Although many aspects of the film are accurate, the story itself is complete fiction. Yes there were two rival theatrical houses in Elizabethan England; yes, women were barred from appearing on stage (in England, anyway; the rest of Europe had no such edict); yes, Christopher Marlowe was the more famous writer of the era, and was killed in a pub brawl, and yes, John Webster was a noted playwright of the next generation with a penchant for extreme violence and gore in his plays. 


All of that is set against a highly speculative story that effectively "reverse engineers" Romeo and Juliet, and allows Tom Stoppard to run amok with theatrical traditions (both modern and Elizabethan). 


For me, this film (sadly) has one serious flaw which prevents it from being quite the masterpiece it could be (more about that on Thursday) but it is nonetheless a very witty and heartfelt celebration of Shakespeare and the creative process.

We'll be screening Shakespeare In Love at 7.30 on Thursday, the 12th of May at the Victoria Park Baptist Church.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Wife in Every Room

Image
In Bringing Up Baby , Cary Grant became the first person to use the word Gay (in its modern sense) in a Hollywood movie. One might hypothesize that by 1938, the film censors were starting to become more permissive about the subtext that was regularly being slipped into films of the era. One would be completely wrong to thusly hypothesize ( to hypothesize thusly ; excuse me). Film censorship in the late 1930s was just as draconian as ever: a year earlier they had insisted that a shot of a  gravestone  be cut from a film because the character in question had committed suicide, and it was "inappropriate" to show her receiving a proper burial. The word gay had only slipped through in Bringing Up Baby because no one at the Hays Office knew what it meant in that context. (I won't tell them if you don't.) Cary Grant certainly knew what it meant, and it's very interesting that he was the one who got to introduce the word to American film audiences. Because Cary Grant, th
Read more

The calla lilies are in bloom again...

Image
At the beginning of last week's film, Ellen Wagstaff Arden has been lost at sea (missing; presumed dead) while engaged as the photographer for an anthropological expedition to Indo-China. While that back-story was obviously developed to establish the premise of the entire film (that she returns after a long absence to find her husband re-married) it is, I think, very notable that her character is shown to have a successful  career . Irrespective of the fact that she is supposed to be married with two young children, the (husband-and-wife) writers of My Favorite Wife saw no conflict in depicting a female character who had a life and a vocation that extended beyond her identity as merely wife and mother. Women in the 1930s were generally seen as people . They were allowed to have ambitions and aspirations that extended beyond "finding a man" and "becoming a mother". It was in the post-war years that mainstream society explicitly attempted to re-define womanhood a
Read more
Image
  Movie Nights at the  Victoria Park Baptist Church And so life goes on. Some of you may remember that our film series in early 2020 was rudely interrupted by a Global Pandemic. The subsequent year and a half has been, well... You know things are pretty bad when you find yourself wondering if there is a plural for "Apocalypse". But at any rate, here we are ( Apocalypses? Apocali? That's going to bother you now, isn't it?) facing the prospect of attempting to pick up the pieces of Civilisation - assuming of course we don't go into another Lockdown first. ( Apocalyae?   Apocalim? ) Movie-going, like so many communal activities, has taken a severe hit during the Pandemic, and I'm willing to hazard a guess that most of the films you have watched over the last eighteen months have been from the comfort of home, with, at most, a family member or two. But watching a film like this: ....isn't really the same as watching a film like this : Sadly we don't quite
Read more

We re-visit stage comedy (in more ways than one) on Thursday the 7th of October

Image
 We are continuing with the "stage comedy" theme next Thursday, after last week's screening of The Importance of Being Earnest. Noises Off began life as a stage comedy which premiered in London's West End in 1982. It is a farce about a farce, which presumably makes it a meta-farce.  This meta-farcical comedy(!) centres around a company of actors rehearsing (and then performing) a play (entitled Nothing On ) which becomes increasingly incoherent as the story progresses.  The original stage version is a merciless (and painfully funny) analysis of just how a farce works - or doesn't work, as the case may be. The film adaptation cranks things up a notch by attempting to film the staging of... the staging of a farce (a meta-meta-farce?) and in the process shows just how difficult it can be to translate a stage play to the screen.  While the film may not be 100% successful, it does manage to be one of the funniest things you will ever see (the first time I saw it, I la
Read more

Depression/Comedy Act II: The RKO Cinematic Universe

Image
If you follow any aspect of modern Hollywood (you know, the stuff I don't usually screen at these film nights) you will probably have noticed that there are a few topics which tend to dominate the discussions these days. In between chit-chat about  Star Wars and Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead , you will almost certainly have encountered people talking about the Marvel Cinematic Universe . Everything, it seems, is a "universe" these days. Mark Zuckerberg is currently trying to turn Facebook into a "Metaverse". Godzilla and King Kong have recently been punching each other to death in the latest instalment of what Universal Studios is calling its "Monster-verse" and Captain America, Iron Man, Thor et al inhabit something their fan base likes to call the Marvel Cinematic Universe . In the early days of comic books, superheroes usually travelled alone. Superman of the 1940s was never going to cross paths with Batman or Wonder Woman (except perhaps
Read more